MSR Hubba 1P Solo Tent — Owner Review

Filed under , .

Full disclosure: Cascade Designs sent me this tent to test during my journeys in 2012 (at my request). I’ve been using it ever since for solo camping. They were confident enough to do this in the knowledge that I would share my opinions of their products — whether positive or negative — on this blog.

2011’s Arctic Cycle finished off the Vaude Hogan 2P tent I’d been using for solo camping over the previous few years. It was a great piece of kit, enduring at a rough guess getting on for 500 pitches in temperatures from below ‑30°C (not what it was designed for!) to above 50°C. But the winter killed the floor’s waterproofing. Months of UV exposure had left flysheet noticeably shrunken. And I’d got through 2 sets of poles, stakes and zippers.

Clearly the time had come for my old tent to pass on. The question was — which of the wide range of backpacking/cycle-touring tents would replace it?

Who is the MSR Hubba designed for?

I felt that a 1‑man solo tent would be appropriate, saving a few hundred grams and reducing my baggage even further than experience already had. I would use it for bicycle journeys, but also future trekking and packrafting expeditions I have in the works, so I wanted something equally at home strapped to a pannier rack or wedged into a pack.

I wanted a lightweight, high-quality tent that would be functional in as wide a variety of conditions as possible, leaning towards warmer climates as a priority. Some compromises would have to exist, but at the very least this meant a waterproof fly for the rain and cold, a well-ventilated standalone insect-proof inner for the hot and dry and infested, and enough adjustments for most common variants in between.

My ideal tent needed to be as free-standing as possible, but to allow me to get some semblance of sleep during windy nights, heavy rain and the occasional foray below freezing. I didn’t want anything above 1.5kg in total weight.

On paper the MSR Hubba fulfilled these criteria, and came with an entourage of recommendations.

MSR Hubba with fly

I’ve since put the MSR Hubba through two solid months of use on a springtime bicycle journey through the U.S. Pacific Northwest, and I’ll be taking the tent further afield later in the year (at which time I’ll update this article). Has it lived up to its reputation?

Size, Shape & Colour

Not everyone with a tent wants to stick out like a sore thumb against a landscape — cycle-tourers in particular. Almost all cycle tours involve wild camping — mine generally involve little else — and a bright orange or yellow flysheet can seriously compromise a hiding place.

MSR recently moved the Hubba range’s colour scheme away from the bright primaries and have chosen a very natural shade of green for the new flysheets. This, in my book, constitutes a very big thumbs-up. It’s less important for the back-country bushwhacker or official campsite user, but it’s valuable peace of mind for anyone who regularly finds themselves sneaking off the road or trail and into a spinney or field after dark. MSR have done well to cater directly for the new primary user group of the Hubba and its larger-capacity brothers — once expeditioners in remote wilderness or above the snowline, perhaps, but now the growing breed of adventure travellers not quite so far from the beaten track.

Wild camp near Port Orford

I was worried about the internal volume of a 1‑man tent, mainly because my previous 2‑man Hogan was so cramped in the foot department and so uncomfortably cosy when actually sleeping 2 people. The Hubba, by contrast, provides its headroom in the mid-section of the dome-shaped tent. The user enters from the long side as opposed to the short end, meaning the porch is generous — a good thing, as there’s no space for luggage in the inner tent itself. The non-opening long side has very little volume, running almost vertically to the ground — this is where the Hubba differs from its bigger brothers with two porches and two entrances.

The tent inner features fully vertical sides and near-vertical end walls which curve over in a semi-circular arch. This allows a surprising amount of room in which to sit up and move around, given that the inner tent’s footprint is the size of an average camping mattress. The trade-off here is a lack of aerodynamics and a slightly heavier package than some of the other 1‑man offerings on the market (we’re talking fractions of a water bottle in weight difference, though). Because of its shape, the Hubba actually feels more roomy than the 2‑man Vaude I mentioned earlier, which was built more for stability in high winds.

(The single line of symmetry means that one can sleep with one’s head at either end of the tent, which might occasionally come in useful for an unlucky night on sloped or uneven ground.)

Overall, the tent has been designed to maximise living space for a solo camper and provides a lot of space for luggage in the porch. Its shape, small footprint and flysheet colour make it a good choice for wild camping and working with sub-optimal pitches.


The entire Hubba range has been cleverly thought out to provide a number of pitching options, which I really like. At its most basic, I’ve used the groundsheet with a bag and mattress out in the open, which on mild and insect-free nights is my preferred way of sleeping.

Next, it’s possible to pitch the inner tent alone, without stakes. The inner tent of the MSR Hubba features a waterproof floor bucket combined with mesh walls, and a small fabric panel for the very top section (presumably to give strength to the pole attachments). The end result is a well-ventilated, fully-sealed insect net with a good view of the night sky.

MSR Hubba inner without fly

The minimal wet-weather setup consists of the poles and flysheet (but no inner tent). The groundsheet is optional in this configuration. As long as there is an anchor for each side of the fly, the tent can be thrown up as a really minimal pole-strengthened tarp shelter.

The common-sense setup combines both of the above options. All options are quick and easy to pitch, with a one-piece pole assembly and the minimum of clutter and tacked-on bits and bobs.

(Imaginative usages beyond those designed might involve the groundsheet and poles as a makeshift drying rack, the flysheet as a tarp or bicycle protector, the groundsheet as a picnic blanket, or the inner tent as a giant fishing net or pasta strainer. I haven’t tried this last idea.)

Stakes (or other anchors) are necessary for the flysheet alone, as the door and opposite vestibule aren’t supported by the pole structure. On rocky ground, use the usual tricks — panniers filled with rocks, bungees to bike wheels, etc.

The supplied ultralight stakes, incidentally, are tough as nails; some of the best I’ve used.

Inside the MSR Hubba

Using my NeoAir X‑lite mattress, I was left with about a hand’s width of floor space to spare; enough for a small bar-bag or some clothes or bits & bobs, but little more. There’d be none at all if using a standard-sized mattress, but the tent is designed for sleep, not storage. The porch is generous in compensation as it comprises the entire length of the tent, easily big enough for a full set of bike-touring luggage or an expedition-sized pack.

Unusual bedfellows

To keep small, valuable items off the inner’s floor there are a couple of small pockets built into the inner tent’s non-entry sidewall, which would fit a warm hat, paperback, headtorch, phone or somesuch. These are useful, but anything bigger or heavier tends to stretch the mesh and hang the contents rather low above the sleeping area.

With floor space at a premium, I would like to see — as featured in the 3‑man Mutha Hubba — a suspended mesh panel slung from the ceiling of the inner tent, which could be detached if not needed or otherwise used to store clothes or other light but bulky items off the floor during the night. It looks like MSR have brought out just such an accessory — the Gear Loft — but I’m not sure if it’s Hubba-compatible. When I find out, I’ll post an update.

In the meantime, there are a number of small strap loops in various corners of the inner tent’s roof which could be used for highly imaginative purposes involving string, belongings and gravity.

Cold & Wet Weather Performance

The first month I spent with this tent was in the Pacific North West of the USA — Washington, Oregon — in the spring. Anyone who knows the region will understand why I’m now relatively experienced with the tent’s performance in cold and wet weather.

Sheltering in Mendocino

As you’d expect from a tent that was designed there (MSR’s parent company Cascade Designs is based in Seattle, WA), wet weather performance is very good. The flysheet is of a relatively tough and thick silicone-coated 40D ripstop nylon, fully seam-sealed and with quality zippers and zip protectors.

The waterproof floor bucket is substantially deep, and the optional ground protector is shaped marginally smaller than the tent footprint itself in order to avoid collecting any water shed by the fly or the edges of the inner floor bucket.

It is a shame that there are no vents built into the fly; the Hubba HP’s vented fly might easily enough have been shared with this model. But it’s clear that the Hubba HP is better designed for colder climates with its ventilation options and more protective inner-tent, while the mesh Hubba’s unvented fly is geared more towards waterproofness in a tropical downpour.

Entering and exiting the tent in the rain is one area in which I feel there is room for improvement. The current design features a zipper down the centre of the porch awning. A stake loop on each side of the zipper makes it possible to use either side of the porch for entry and exit. The chosen side of the awning, when opened, can be tied back alongside the inner tent’s door.

But even with the most diligent efforts, this wet flysheet material inevitably splashes some of its water into the inner tent. The fixed stake position also means that it’s not possible to change which side of the porch is used as a door after opening, which would be useful if the wind changed during the night and it was still raining in the morning.

If, like me, you’d rather not put your hands and bags in a muddy vestibule, MSR have thoughtfully started making an optional extended groundsheet called the ‘Mudmat’ that covers the vestibule floor.

Camping in a garden in Capetown

Although I prefer the Hubba overall by a large margin, Vaude’s vestibule design for the Hogan would address all of these issues at once. Rather than a central zip, it has a single zip that runs up from one bottom corner by the inner tent corner stake, up and over at the top of the porch’s apex, and down to the opposite corner stake, in a mirror image. There are four sliders, meaning that either side can be unzipped, regardless of the single vestibule stake’s placement. The tie-back is to the central ridge of the porch, keeping the wet door fabric well away from the inner tent.

A bonus of this setup is that the Hogan’s porch can be unzipped slightly at the top apex on both sides for adjustable ventilation, which in the case of the Hubba would make the tent little short of perfect. A small design modification with instant and multiple benefits, and no disadvantages that I can think of except for a few grams’ more zipper. (Funnily enough, MSR’s new 2‑man backpacking tent looks almost identical to the Hogan.)

Warm & Dry Weather Performance

This is one of the key reasons I went for the 1.4kg Hubba, rather than the lighter Hubba HP: the mesh-only inner.  It is ideal for hot weather camping when a small degree of protection is still desired, but you want maximum ventilation and enjoy having a view of the night sky and your surroundings at night.

Drying a dew-covered tent

As might be expected, the inner-tent performs well in these conditions. The mesh is a fairly fine weave, and it does in fact have some insulating properties, probably as a result of trapped air in the mesh — this is most noticeable when the mesh collects condensation at colder temperatures, rather than moisture evaporating through it and onto the inside of the flysheet. But the balance between protection and breathability is about right overall.


Overall, I’m impressed. The Hubba is significantly more well-suited to my needs than my previous tent. The living space and storage space are generous for the size and weight of the package, and it delivers enough pitching options for most conditions you might encounter in tropical through to temperate adventuring. Accessories are available for specific preferences or really wet climates. As I’m a wild-camper, the colour scheme is really ideal.

And, being MSR, the build quality is as good as it gets. No wonder the Hubba has earned such a good reputation. Recommended.

Since this review was published, MSR have replaced the Hubba with the Hubba NX, a lighter version of the same tent, available with two different fly colours, but otherwise more or less the same. I used one in 2014 in Patagonia and noticed little difference in quality, though long-term durability needs longer to judge. Go for the green option from Rutland Cycling or TrekKit.
The Europe-specific HP version of the Hubba, with better ventilation options and fabric rather than mesh for the inner tent, is available from and, among other online retailers.

Comments (skip to respond)

24 responses to “MSR Hubba 1P Solo Tent — Owner Review”

  1. Thanks a bunch for the review. I’m looking for a tent to take to Mongolia — I need one that will stand up to some pretty rough winds/rain storms in the summer. How does the Hubba do in wind?

    1. It’s not specifically designed for strong winds, though with guy lines it’ll certainly stand up to all but the very worst. I took a Vaude Hogan Ultralight to Mongolia and found the wedge-shaped design more suited to heavy winds — if pitched correctly, of course!

  2. Great review Tom, The 1p is a little on the small side for me but I don’t mind carrying the extra 500g for the Hubba Hubba. 

    I’ve been quite suprised at the durability of the tent, though its starting to get tired now after 180 nights out in Africa.

    For 3 season trips I’ll be sticking with the hubba hubba though have splashed out on a hilleberg for the up and coming madness 🙂

    1. I’m watching closely! 😀

      I’m sure the Hilleberg will serve you well. Taking a Vaude Hogan Ultralight to the Arctic in winter was not one of my better moves. Didn’t die, though.

  3. Great review and spot on! Absolutely love my Hubba. Had it covered in light snow, frozen solid with frost, baked in 45C in the Kalahari and pounded by driving rain… no problem!

    I’ve used some thin cord to make a ‘wash line’ inside between the loops, and improvised my own version of the Gear Loft.

    Awesome product indeed!

    1. Good to hear it’s been through worse than I’ve managed to put it through!

      1. Hi Tom: thanks for a great review. We too love our Hubba Hubba! It provided reliable shelter for more than 10 months of sea kayaking on BC-Alaska west coast. Add to this another 3 or 4 months of backpacking, music festivals etc. It met premature retirement when zippers were stressed in a bit of a panic when the people in it woke up to find themselves in a bit of a creek flood. What did we do? We bought a new one…

        Ray: thanks for the info re: snow. We are planning a bike tour across Canada (west to east), maybe hang a right and then.…

        For those that might be interested, you can find a short endorsement that I gave Hubba Hubba, from a sea kayaker’s perspective, at:‑sea-kayaking-gear-sleep-rest/

  4. We have the 2 man version which is great. We have the footprint and gear shed to and have nearly no problems in 8 months of use. It has kept us safe and dry through several storms, has stood up to around zero degree weather at 3000m above sea level and remained unshaken by some serious winds.

    The gear shed is great for storing 2 persons worth of stuff in campsites, hiding from prying eyes and as a small person, I can cook in there using the flap as a heat out.

    We have tore one of the pole ends a little as it didn’t get pushed all the way in when putting the tent together. Our fault really, with minor repairs it still works though.

    There is minimal contact between the inner and fly so we rarely get any leaks inside and there is ample room for a very tall man to sit upright inside. We particularly liked that it’s freestanding allowing some innovative pitching places. The most so was in a storm drain (during a very dry period) on a coastal road in Corsica as there was sheer cliffs everywhere else and it was getting dark (good planning). We needed to pitch it as a mozzie net but it did it’s job admirably.

  5. Tom — great review! Any news on the Gear Loft being compatible with the Hubba? I have noticed that they now have the Gear Shed that goes with the Hubba and the two man Hubba Hubba — a kind of porch area that would be ideal for luggage storage. Gives an additional 2.5 sq m and weighs 887 grams.

  6. Peter Jordan avatar
    Peter Jordan

    Great review. I would disagree with the color being ideal for wild camping though. In my tiny amount of wild camping, I never have the confidence to throw over the cover till last light. Would be perfect if the same color as the green Akto IMHO.

  7. Michael avatar


    I used to have a Salewa Micra Ⅱ tent but since the flysheet was stolen and Salewa doesn’t provide a replacement (customer service 1/5 😉 ) I’m planning to buy the MSR Hubba. I’m worried about the size. Usually I sleep on my belly, hands under my head (pillow!) and elbows to the sides. I like to do the same when resting on my back. Unfortunately this luxurious sleeping-style requires about 72cm width just to prevent my elbows from colliding with the inner tent. Can you try if it’s possible to sleep like that in the Hubba? The Hubba Hubba is much bigger and kinda overkill for me, I think.


    1. I will try it out for you and post back here. (I think it’ll be a bit of a squeeze — the Hubba is 70cm wide according to the specs.)

      1. Hi!
        I just bought the MSR Hubba now! It’s neither too small nor too big, just perfect for me! =) I can sleep in said style, though its a close thing and I should probably try to change it.

        The tent is great but the quality is a little bit disappointing for the prize. It’s mostly cosmetic flaws like ugly seams on the inner tent.
        Two issues I’ve noticed:
        1.) The flysheet (almost) collides with the inner tent on the opposite side of the porch (“non-entry” side you called it) close to the corners of the tent.
        2.) The poles require very much force to put into the eyelets. Especially the short pole on the roof requires a controlled amount of force, tensioning the fabric to a dangerous degree. Maybe the fabric is going to stretch a bit and it’s all going to get easier.

        All in all the tent seems to be a good choice althought I’ve only pitched it up in the garden with ~40km/h wind.


        1. Hey Michael

          I did actually test the tent for you — sorry for forgetting to post a write-up! I could lie comfortably like you described, with my elbows touching the sides but not squashed.

          I wouldn’t worry about the poles. Modern tent poles are designed to work under high tension. I’ve used several tents, including 3 MSRs, and it’s quite normal.

          About the flysheet, just make sure you tension the corner straps and stake it out fully. The aim is to prevent rain getting in — if it does that, it’s working 🙂

          Safe travels,


  8. great review thanks. i’m looking for a lightweight mesh tent for West Africa travel and your recommendation appreciated. I have an Aussie Mossie Dome II , a great tent for hot climates and ideal to throw in the Ute or kayak but a little heavy for trekking. 

    Oh, i had a Vaude Hogan too, i guess heavy by todays standards but that tent was cool and got me lots of places. Friends running a trekking company used to use them for clients cos they were strong (apart from the poles…) and real easy to put up at the end of a long day …

    1. The Hogan was strong indeed, especially in high wind and gusty conditions — really stable. The poles did wear out relatively soon, though.

      1. There is more than one kind of Vaude Hogan:
        ‑Vaude Hogan 2 Man Tent
        ‑Vaude Hogan Ultralight
        ‑Vaude Hogan Ultralight Argon
        ‑Hogan Super Ultralight XP 2p
        ‑Hogan Super Ultra Light 1–2P
        ‑Hogan SUL ECO 1–2P

        I also recon the new MSR tent you’re mentioning (you meant MSR Nook, right?) was based more on Vaude Taurus than a Hogan‑1–2‑man-tent-backpacking-tent.html

        Thanks for the review of MSR Hubba, may consider it, but first I’ll probably go for Hogan SUL or Easton Mountain Products Kilo 2P Tent. Regards
        Easton Mountain Products 2013 Kilo 2P Tent

        1. Vaude Hogan = Vaude Hogan 2 Man Tent = Vaude Hogan Ultralight. I’ve reviewed this here. (The others are different tents altogether.)

          1. Yes, I read your review of the Hogan tent. But I beg to disagree — these are not not as you claim ‘different tents altogether’ — they all represent Vaude Hogan series and I may prove it — here you are:







            Plus yours — the one you tested and reviewed — so long story short — not the same tents, but the same series 😉 Got myself the Argon version few days ago and will test it in two weeks during kayaking trip — will see if it likes winter 8)

          2. The tent in the first link is not a Hogan. The picture is incorrect, and in any case it is out of stock.

            I reviewed the classic Vaude Hogan Ultralight. The others are different tents. Obviously, the actual design of a tent is a better real world measure of ‘different-ness’ than the name the manufacturer decided to give it. Check out Vaude’s website for the current and authoritative range.

            Let us know if your Argon survives the winter!

          3. Hi again!

            I know Hogans rather well — the first tent is a Hogan. Yes, out of stock, furthermore it’s now discontinued. That’s hpw it looks like — all those users can’t be wrong — here’s a link to it

            I may admit you might take it by mistake for a Terraquattro

            The actual design of the continued versions is frankly more or less the same — they just slightly vary in length, width and weight — Hogan SUL being the lightest of them all with it’s 1250gr. The manufacturer had to make some distinction within the series, but I’m sure you will agree that calling the Hogan models UL, UL Argon, SUL, SUL ECO and SUL XP wasn’t the worst solution 😉
            Putting Hogan aside — chosing a new tent from a different producer (or during one of your journeys) have you ever come across (and considered) any Tarptents?

            Any opinions regarding their tents?
            They are really hard to come by in Europe (tax+customs)

            Argon will surely make it — only three days of kayaking, so two nights of camping and it’s not even snowing, but sure, I shall let you know upon returning. Regards!

          4. I’ve come across the Tarptents, yes, but never had the chance to use them. I would like to, though.

            Enjoy the kayaking trip!

  9. Nigel Francis avatar
    Nigel Francis

    That’s what I call a review Tom.

    Last year I purchased the Hubba Hubba. For me the over riding factor is simplicity. 

    Only downside was I did manage to tear a tent pole end. Supplier/importer replaced, no-quibble. Can’t ask for more than that. Customer service from MSR, 5 out of 5.

    Look forward to many cycling adventures down under with it end of this year.

    1. Good to hear that MSR’s customer service is up there with their build quality! And you’re right about the simplicity. So simple that I completely overlooked it in the review 🙂

Something to add?